Creationism Creeps into U.S. Classrooms

One in eight U.S. high school biology teachers presents creationism or intelligent design in a positive light in the classroom, a new survey shows, despite a federal court’s recent ban against it. The research also revealed that between 12 percent and 16 percent of the nation’s biology teachers are creationists.More scary results from the survey:

 

read more | digg story

  • SfavillareAtea

    I recommend the Nova show “Judgment Day: Intelligent Design on Trial.” For me, one of the most fascinating details was that the prosecution requisitioned from the publisher all the drafts of Pandas and People, an early and prominent book teaching intelligent design. The prosecution’s meticulous researcher discovered that after a major ruling against the teaching of creationism in California, the next draft of Pandas and People had the word “creationism” changed in every instance to–you guessed it–”intelligent design.”

    After the presentation of this evidence, those in Dover who argued
    that intelligent design was in no way related to creationism were left without a leg to stand on.

    Here is the web link

    http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/id/program.html

    Ruling by JUDGE JOHN E. JONES III: “In an era where we’re
    trying to cure cancer–where we’re trying to–prevent pandemics,
    where we’re trying to keep science and math education on the
    cutting edge in the United States. To introduce and teach bad
    science to ninth grade students make very little sense to me. You
    know, garbage in, garbage out. And it doesn’t benefit any of us
    who benefit daily from scientific discoveries.”

  • http://au.youtube.com/user/askegg askegg

    For some reason Akismet marked your comment as spam. I have fixed it now. Sorry about that SfavillareAtea.

    It’s is a devastating point when they do statistical comparisons of the two texts and graph the frequencies of “creationism” and “intelligent design”. You can plainly see the wholesale exchange of one term for the other.

    Why defenders of this “scientific theory” need to cower behind such dishonest tactics flies in the face of the scientific method and common decency.

    If they want ID taught in the class room, then go through the process of making predictions with your theory, testing those predictions, publishing your paper, having it heavily criticised by your scientific peers. If it survives all of this you can call it a theory and teach it in the class room. Until then, it’s just a silly idea based on superstition, myth, and vague notions of the supernatural.


44 – An Atheist Temple

BBC News – Row over Indonesia atheist Facebook post Priority is to protect marriage | Herald Sun No Fetus Can Feed Us | Unreasonable Faith Alain de Botton: Atheism 2.0 | Video on TED.com


Further Reading

Persecuting Christians

The other day I was discussing the merits of nutrition for the prevention and treatment of cancer, when a good friend of mine accused me of “persecuting Christians”.  The comment may have been flippantly fired off without much thought, but it stuck with me for a few days.  Do I really persecute Christians? While I’ve…
Continue reading

Dog Heads

The excellent British broadcaster BBC 4 recently aired a fascinating program called “The Medieval Mind” which explores the philosophy, theology, and predominate thinking of the dark ages.  The first episode deals with knowledge and revealed numerous intriguing insights into how the medieval mind determined epistemological truths. Monks, priests, and other godly people were in possession…
Continue reading

Matt’s Human Morality

Matt Dillhunty (president of the Atheist Community of Austin, co-host of “Non-Prophets Radio“, and “The Atheist Experience”) recently debated Father Hans Jacobse (an Antiochian Orthodox Priest) at The University of Maryland on 16th November.  Full video of the event can be found here (although only 6 of the 9 videos have been posted online as…
Continue reading

The perfect God

I want a god whose ultimate goals which do not necessitate the creation of mysterious suffering and death. I want a god who doesn’t violate causation by causing things to begin to exist from nothing in the absence of time. I want a god who does not give us “free will” then punishes us for…
Continue reading

Atheism 2.0

“Atheism 2.0” is a 20 minute TED presentation by Alain de Botton in which he proposes a new approach to evangelising atheism. Alain suggests (apparently without evidence) that we have “secularised badly” and we should sift through the rituals, traditions, and behaviours of religion to identify and adopt their efficient mechanisms. “I have come here…
Continue reading

The Bizarre Bible

Atheists are often told by believers to read the Bible and it will all become clear.  Trouble is, many of us have tried that and it doesn’t seem to have helped.  Take these verses for example: This does not sound like a great night out to me. “But Rabshakeh said unto them, Hath my master…
Continue reading