<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Creationist asks dumb questions.  I answer.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.godless.biz/2009/03/23/creationist-asks-dumb-questions-i-answer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.godless.biz/2009/03/23/creationist-asks-dumb-questions-i-answer/</link>
	<description>...believe us or go to hell.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 23:10:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: askegg</title>
		<link>http://www.godless.biz/2009/03/23/creationist-asks-dumb-questions-i-answer/#comment-300</link>
		<dc:creator>askegg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 04:21:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://godless.biz/?p=1512#comment-300</guid>
		<description>You are of course correct.  The distinction between asexual and sexual reproduction is not as clear cut as many people think.  There are all sorts of shades in between. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are of course correct.  The distinction between asexual and sexual reproduction is not as clear cut as many people think.  There are all sorts of shades in between.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.godless.biz/2009/03/23/creationist-asks-dumb-questions-i-answer/#comment-299</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 04:16:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://godless.biz/?p=1512#comment-299</guid>
		<description>Good answers, but the creationists who don&#039;t think things through make it easier.  
 
This one (#8) is not quite right.  The first sexual reproduction would not require members of the opposite sex.  Conjugation (for example, fungi or bacteria) qualifies, as does various trades of DNA among simple hermaphrodite forms. 
 
// 
8. With what did the first cell capable of sexual reproduction reproduce? 
Members of the opposite sex. 
 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good answers, but the creationists who don&#039;t think things through make it easier.  </p>
<p>This one (#8) is not quite right.  The first sexual reproduction would not require members of the opposite sex.  Conjugation (for example, fungi or bacteria) qualifies, as does various trades of DNA among simple hermaphrodite forms. </p>
<p>//<br />
8. With what did the first cell capable of sexual reproduction reproduce?<br />
Members of the opposite sex.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

