What kind of world?

Gary Ablett was probably not well known outside of Australia but today that all changed, although I am not convinced he would be thoroughly pleased with the reputation he has rightly earned.

“Today, our newspapers, televisions and computer screens are full of shocking and horrible crimes, detailing a very serious decline in morals and values in our community.” – Gary Ablett

Up until today Mr. Ablett was known for not being too bad at chasing inflated balls of animal skin round a patch of grass, being a drug addict, suffering from depression, beating people who have the unfortunate privilege of sitting next to his wife, giving a 19 year old girls heroin in his hotel room (she later died), and being assaulted by a man who later jumped from a Melbourne high rise apartment block the day before he was due in court to defend himself.  Convenient.

Gary sounds like the perfect character to seek religious, social, and moral advice from, which is exactly what the Herald Sun did.  So where does Gary gain his impeccable behaviour? The Bible of course!

“We are a nation that was originally founded upon the word of God and established on the authority of biblical truth.” – Gary Ablett

No Gary, you’re completely wrong. Regardless of what the individuals who wrote our Constitution actually believed, what they enshrined in Australia’s foundational document ensures no religion shall be established or prohibited. This is at variation to many Christian faiths which honestly believe those without the faith are destined for an eternity in Hell.

“The Commonwealth shall not make any law for establishing any religion, or for imposing any religious observance, or for prohibiting the free exercise of any religion…” – Australian Constitution, Section 116

This clause was explicitly placed there to separate church and state within our great country, and exclude matters of theology and metaphysics influencing public policy.  Mr. Ablett seems to think differently:

“However, over recent years we have shifted further and further away from the inclusion of anything godly in our planning, decision-making and policy-setting …” – Gary Ablett

Perhaps Mr. Ablett thinks we should be consulting the Bible on how much to charge for our slaves, or how much we can beat them? Perhaps rapist should be forced to marry their victims after the appropriate fee has been paid to the father, or we should ban all seafood, mixed fibre clothing, and stone those who work on the Sabbath or commit adultery? These are all “godly decisions” and “fabulous public policy” according to the Bible.

Also, despite obviously not going to the Global Atheist Conference, Gary feels perfectly qualified to state that:

“Richard Dawkins, a renowned atheist, gave a message entitled, ‘From goo to you through the zoo’.”

No he didn’t, but I would not for a second believe facts to get in Gary’s way. He’s on a mission from God, you see.

His piece (which has been revealed as being largely stolen from another) proudly shouts his ignorance of evolutionary theory with such gems as “we descended from apes” (we are apes), Charles Darwin had “no hard data” (to spite highly scrutinising animal breeding, comparative anatomy, and the fossil record), and the fossil record does not support evolution (even though they clearly change over time), all while openly confessing “to being no scientist”.  Got that right.  Try reading more than one book, mate.

“Let’s take another example. Evolution teaches that matter plus energy (light or heat) plus time equals biogenesis, the cause of new life.” – Gary Ablett

It’s no wonder Mr. Ablett think’s evolution bunk as he believes it states peanut butter will spontaneously spring new life. Sorry to tell you Gary, but the hypothesis of spontaneous generation was falsified over 100 years ago. Way to keep up with modern science and knowledge.

Mr. Ablett goes on to wonder at the universe and conclude God.  Unfortunately, he has slipped into the all too common trap of observing the natural world’s incredibly complex, subtle intricacies, and beautiful workings cannot have arisen “by chance”.  Such wonders can understandably lead people to conclude that a grand designer was responsible, so we should all believe in virgin births, flying zombies, and crackers can magically turn into Jesus flesh. Or something.

Not withstanding, even if the complexity of the universe is adequately explained by a designer, then one must be intellectually honest enough to apply the exact same logic to the creator. Complexity is not solved by adding even more complexity.  God is the ultimate Boeing 747.

“Darwinism cannot explain the origin of life because it cannot explain the origin of information.” – Gary Ablett

No Gary. “Darwinism” (whatever that is) does not even attempt to explain the origins of life, just as the theory of gravity does not explain where it came from. You mind has been so poisoned by the one answer you do have (god done did it) that you think all answers apply to everything.  Just what kind of world does Gary live in?

Perhaps Mr. Ablett should stick to chasing balls around and leave the thinking to those better equipped?

References

Herald Sun article

If Gary Ablett is the product of intelligent design, I’ll be a monkeys uncle.

  • http://www.facebook.com/james.spiller James Spiller

    Gary could be commended for wanting to speak out for the betterment of our society, but everything after that point collapses in a heap.

    His critique of science is oversimplistic and flawed, his reasoning is a string of non sequiturs, he hasn't learnt enough biology to even begin to use it seriously, and effectively saying "'cause The Bible says so" is not an argument.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/SeandBlogonaut SeandBlogonaut

    I'd like to live in a world where national newspapers provided decent content and where, rich well connected drug pushers went to gaol

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/askegg askegg

      Amen. I find it incredible that any newspaper would turn to Gary Ablett for moral advice.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/Cynskeptical Cynskeptical

    Well reading over the comments, a vast majority of them condemn both him and the newpaper in their dealings.

    Don't forget the newspaper as we know it, is pretty much becoming extinct. Even the web based versions of their original counterparts are just not worth reading. So it make sense that they would have to stoop to such lows in order to get readers. Even if the readers tell them they are a bunch of weak minded fucktards who wouldn't know a good story if it jumped up and bit them.

    Gary is a fucking tool who has fucked up his life since his somewhat amazing football career(I say "somewhat amazing" cause I fucking hate the sport and he wasn't anything special) and now thinks that a sudden move towards be saved by god is his ticket to redemption. As one poster commented on the article, how about he fixes all the fuck ups in his own backyard before trying to fix the fucks up in other peoples backyards.

  • http://www.facebook.com/james.spiller James Spiller

    I should qualify my " … speak out for the betterment of our society … " sentence.
    Gary's statement is a subjective observation, and is not supported in his article with any statistics on crime, let alone the 'moral decay' (if indeed there is any) of our society.


44 – An Atheist Temple

BBC News – Row over Indonesia atheist Facebook post Priority is to protect marriage | Herald Sun No Fetus Can Feed Us | Unreasonable Faith Alain de Botton: Atheism 2.0 | Video on TED.com


Further Reading

ACL lie about census

The Australian Christian Lobby are lying again. This time they are mischaracterising the Atheist Foundation of Australia’s “No Religion” campaign by stating (emphasis mine): “While the census data is rightly used to assist the government to plan for services and infrastructure, other groups, including some atheists, are seeking to push their  agendas by encouraging people [...]

Dog Heads

The excellent British broadcaster BBC 4 recently aired a fascinating program called “The Medieval Mind” which explores the philosophy, theology, and predominate thinking of the dark ages.  The first episode deals with knowledge and revealed numerous intriguing insights into how the medieval mind determined epistemological truths. Monks, priests, and other godly people were in possession [...]

Atheists n Agnostics speak out in Arabic

I flagged this video a few days ago, but only watched it this evening. It’s is not often we see ex-muslims speaking out against the “religion of peace”. What these people have done is extraordinary and brave given the fundamentalists attraction to extreme violence.

The perfect God

I want a god whose ultimate goals which do not necessitate the creation of mysterious suffering and death. I want a god who doesn’t violate causation by causing things to begin to exist from nothing in the absence of time. I want a god who does not give us “free will” then punishes us for [...]

Atheism 2.0

“Atheism 2.0” is a 20 minute TED presentation by Alain de Botton in which he proposes a new approach to evangelising atheism. Alain suggests (apparently without evidence) that we have “secularised badly” and we should sift through the rituals, traditions, and behaviours of religion to identify and adopt their efficient mechanisms. “I have come here [...]

The Bizarre Bible

Atheists are often told by believers to read the Bible and it will all become clear.  Trouble is, many of us have tried that and it doesn’t seem to have helped.  Take these verses for example: This does not sound like a great night out to me. “But Rabshakeh said unto them, Hath my master [...]