The phrase “atheism is the default position” is often heard and, like atheism itself, it’s often misunderstood and misused. Uncovering the error is a rather simple affair when you have the correct definitions in mind.
“A”: Without
“Theism”: Belief in god(s)
“Atheism”: Without a belief in god(s)
For example, this entry on the weirdly named “Is God a Squirrel? [1] blog boldly asserts:
“Atheism is a response to religion. It is a disbelief in god(s). It is not something one is born with.”
Here is where the author runs into problems. Atheism is not a response to a religion, nor a disbelief in religion or gods, nor a religion in itself. Atheism is the lack of a belief in gods. The author flies perilously close to this idea throughout the article:
“Lets say I believe in flying farnoggles. Now, of course you have never heard of a flying farnoggle in your life. You have no concept of what one is. You can not believe, or disbelieve them because you have no knowledge of them. So to say that you were born with a disbelief in flying farnoggles would be ridiculous.”
Without knowledge of farnoggles or gods no one can be considered to actively hold the belief they exist. They lack the belief, and can therefore be considered “afarnoggles” and atheists.
If seems a little strange, that’s because it is. Atheism is not a term which should exist, nor would it but for the prevalence of theistic beliefs. Yes, atheism can be considered a response to theistic beliefs, but it is strictly the lack of a belief. As Sam Harris says, we do not have a word for people who do not play the piano – and nor should we.
“In fact, “atheism” is a term that should not even exist. No one ever needs to identify himself as a “non-astrologer” or a “non-alchemist.” We do not have words for people who doubt that Elvis is still alive or that aliens have traversed the galaxy only to molest ranchers and their cattle. Atheism is nothing more than the noises reasonable people make in the presence of unjustified religious beliefs.” – Sam Harris, Letter to a Christian Nation
So next time you hear someone contest “atheism is the default position” they are probably labouring under incorrect definitions.
[1] I would answer “no”, as squirrel’s actually exist.
Tagged with: atheism, default, definition
This week I meet with Aronra in Melbourne for the Global Atheist Convention, and thought it would be a good idea to chat up with Australia’s most popular secular humanist Catholic Father Bob for a chat. Strap yourself in for this one.
On Thursday the 17th May the churches of Tasmania will be hosting an event at the Stanley Burbury Theatre entitled “Excellent Marriage”. According to their web site the event “aims to celebrate the importance and value of marriage for the Australian community”. They say “people from religious and non-religious backgrounds, young and old, are all invited to…
Continue reading
This is a continuation of my reply to Andrew Finden’s “one last philosophical hurrah” post, and addresses the question “why believe there is a god?” It is encouraging to read the opening statement of this section where Andrew admits “that one can cannot prove that God exists”, however he quickly (and rightly) dismisses philosophical materialism…
Continue reading
Those who have been following this blog for a while will, no doubt, recall the various discussions/debates/arguments I have had with Andrew Finden in the past. As frustrating as I find them at times, I think he often tackles interesting and difficult topics with a calm intelligence not very often found in the religious debate. This…
Continue reading
Wayne Swan is currently having meeting to finalise the Australian federal budget. In these tough economic times it is more important than ever to ensure your hard earned tax dollar is being spent in the most effective and efficient manner. In view of this I can think of one poorly thought out federal program which,…
Continue reading
Last weekend I attend the second Global Atheist Convention run by the Atheist Foundation of Australia in Melbourne. The convention attracted over 4,000 attendees to listen to extraordinary line up of world class speakers from a variety of disciplines on a wide range of topics. The convention began with a comedy line up including the brilliantly hilarious…
Continue reading
Last Monday on Australia’s ABC television network the jet-lagged evolutionary biologist Richard Dawkins squared off against Catholic Cardinal George Pell on the “Q and A” program with unimpressive results. A transcript of the entire show can be found in the ABC’s web site. The level of intellectual debate on this episode of Q and A…
Continue reading
Pingback: Atheism ~ Morality in everyday Life. « An atheist dwelling in the Himalayas.
Pingback: The Perils of Not Being a Christian « The Inactive Activist
Pingback: Theism Vs Atheism; Billboard Wars! | An atheist dwelling in the Himalayas.